Acee - Excellent. Thank you for addressing my comments.
- Christian On Jan 5, 2010, at 14:27, Acee Lindem wrote: > Hi Christian, > I believe I've addressed both of your comments in the draft-ietf- > ospf-af-alt-10.txt version. I did take your suggestion of explicitly > stately that these enhancements only apply when multiple instances > are being used to support multiple address families as defined in > the draft. > > Thanks, > Acee > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: Christian Vogt > |Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 6:18 PM > |To: Gen-ART Mailing List > |Cc: Acee Lindem; [email protected]; [email protected]; > |[email protected]; [email protected]; Ross Callon; [email protected] > |Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-af-alt-09 > | > |I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > |reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > |http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > | > |Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call > |comments you may receive. > | > | > |Document..........: draft-ietf-ospf-af-alt-09 > |Reviewer..........: Christian Vogt > |Review date.......: December 2, 2009 > |IESG Telechat date: December 3, 2009 > | > | > |Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits > | that should be fixed before publication. > | > | > |The document describes small modifications to the OSPFv3 > |protocol that enable the use of OSPFv3 for multiple address > |families simultaneously. > |The document is well-written and concise, and is ready for > publication. > |However, one nit that should be fixed is the following editorial one: > | > |The document uses the acronym "AF" both to denote the term > |address family, as well as to refer to the OSPF extensions > |being specified in the document (e.g., in the definition of > |the AF bit in section 2.2). > |This is confusing, in particular because "AF" is explicitly > |defined only to mean the former, not the latter. I suggest > |using a different name, e.g., "AF support", to denote the OSPF > |extensions being specified, and adding a definition for this > |to the introduction of the document. > | > |In section 3, "Backwards Compatibility", it may furthermore be > |worth mentioning that all modifications to OSPFv3, as > |specified in this document, exclusively affect the use of > |OSPFv3 for new address families. > |Since this is a prerequisite for backwards compatibility, it > |will further support the backwards compatibility claim of this > section. > | > |- Christian > | > | > | _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
