I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see *http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html*).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-vendor-message-01.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2010-02-09 IETF LC End Date: 2010-02-17 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None but look at the review of DHCPv4 companion draft Nits/editorial comments: None Thanks [email protected] PS: IMHO this new message type would cause damage only through its not-standard header layout, i.e., very broken option parsers could show they are broken. In conclusion my answer to the summary comment of the DHCPv4 companion draft review is this new message type is not worse than a corrupt message. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
