Forgot to reply. Done ! Lou
On 2/4/2010 11:42 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > I think IANA owns the MIB module. > > You're right, we should chase IANA to make sure they understand what to do. > > Lou, can you ping them? > > A > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Miguel A. Garcia" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; > <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Cc: "General Area Review Team" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:08 AM > Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-dcsc-channel-ext-03.txt > >> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) >> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >> you may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-dcsc-channel-ext-03.txt >> Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[email protected]> >> Review Date: 04-Feb-2010 >> IETF LC End Date: 05-Feb-2010 >> IESG Telechat date: (if known) >> >> Summary: The document is ready for publication as a Standards track RFC. >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> The document is well written and very clear. My only concern lies in >> Section 4.1, last paragraph: >> >> It should be noted that the assigned value should be reflected in >> IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC at >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib. >> >> So, I don't really know if IANA needs to modify the MIB, or someone needs >> to modify the MIB and uploaded to IANA, or nothing is supposed to happen >> here. I noticed in the I-D tracker that IANA is not planning to take any >> action with respect the MIB, is this the authors' intention? >> >> /Miguel >> >> -- >> Miguel A. Garcia >> +34-91-339-3608 >> Ericsson Spain >> > > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
