Hi, Version 04 addresses all of my concerns.
Thanks! Ben. On Feb 21, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> Thanks, that helps, and I think it pushes it back down to an editorial >> comment. But I still wonder why a normative requirement like this is not one >> of the labeled requirements. Right now, it's sort of like saying "We've got >> requirements A, B,C, 1, 2, 3, and this other thing". > > > I looked at it again and the classification appears to be a bit arbitrary. > I changed it again and flattened the structure. > > I re-submitted a new version. > > Ciao > Hannes _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
