I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl-04.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2010-03-12 IETF LC End Date: 2010-03-15 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready, except for normative reference issue. -------- Major issue: ------------ Implementers of this feature MAY also wish to implement the "Reflect Octets" feature, described in [I-D.ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets], once it has been published as an RFC. I think this is a normative reference, even though it's optional, since it uses a normative keyword. That could be fixed by s/MAY/may/, but the later reference to the same draft is clearly normative: If the Control-Client has selected the Reflect Octets feature [I-D.ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets] in combination with the Individual Session Control feature (after the Server identified its capability), AND utilizes the feature to insert a locally-specified request number in the Request-TW-Session command, THEN the Control Client MAY send more than one Request-TW-Session command to a given Server without waiting for the corresponding Accept-Session message. In such a case the Access-Session response reflects the locally- specified request number. Note that when the Reflect Octets feature is being used all Request-TW-Session command and Accept-Session responses MUST include the locally-specified request number.
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
