Thanks David. My comments are inline. ... > All of my comments are minor. > > The IPv4 addresses used in the examples are not from the 192.0.2.0/24 > block of addresses for examples - they appear to be IP Multicast addresses, > and I'm not sure what IP Multicast addresses are appropriate for use in > examples. Please check with your WG chairs and AD on what (if anything) > should be done about this (the examples may be ok as-is).
I believe they are OK per the information I was given by the transport ADs. > The 3388bis entry on the Updates: line on the title page is novel (I've > never seen that before). Please add an RFC Editor Note to the Abstract > asking the RFC Editor to replace that with the RFC number for > draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc3388bis-04 when that draft is published as an RFC. Sure. > idnits 2.12.01 found a couple of nits: > > == You're using the IETF Trust Provisions' Section 6.b License Notice from > 12 Sep 2009 rather than the newer Notice from 28 Dec 2009. (See > http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/) I am using the conversion tool from http://xml.resource.org/. Looks like they finally realized that their tool was not generating the right thing until now. If that is indeed fixed, the next revision will have the above boilerplate. > --> Just copy the new boilerplate ... > > == Outdated reference: A later version (-07) exists of > draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-05 > > --> This should be updated if draft is revised, but will be caught > by the RFC Editor in any case. Not a problem. -acbegen > Thanks, > --David > ---------------------------------------------------- > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 > [email protected] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > ---------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
