On Apr 14, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > This draft represents an IPv6 address textually (c.f. Section > 3.1). As such, does this textual representation has any bearing > to what is being discussed in > draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-07 (see > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation/)?
Thanks for the review! The 6man draft is talking about presentation format, not internal format. The netboot URIs are strictly for machine consumption, not for human consumption, and there's no intention that they be sorted or searched. So while an implementor of a user interface for the netboot functionality might want to refer to the 6man draft, should it progress, I don't think that it's something that's sufficiently relevant to the netboot draft that it would make sense, for instance, to delay the netboot draft until the 6man draft progresses. Does that make sense, or am I missing something? _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
