On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:26:09PM -0400, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for > draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings-12.txt > > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed > Standard but please consider my comments on -07 (especially the > wrong reference). > > * Section 2 > > "Subsequent to the publication of "On Channel Bindings" [RFC5246]" > > Shouldn't this reference point to RFC5056 instead?
Yes. I keep forgetting to fix that :( > * Normative references > > Why are the normative references for 'tls-server-end-point' separated > out from the other normative references? That's to clarify that FIPS-180-2 is not something that tls-unique depends on. (Actually, this section should be named "Additional Normative References for 'tls-server-end-point'".) This clarification is, strictly speaking, not necessary. But it also does no harm. If the RFC-Editor objects we'll fold it into the normative references section. Nico -- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
