Am I reading this correctly that a few of the drafts have blank reviewer fields? Including 2 xmpp drafts for which I have a particular interest.
Thanks, Ben. On Nov 27, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Mary Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies yet again for the delay. > > Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the Dec 2nd, 2010 telechat: > http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-101202.html > > With the updated spreadsheets: > http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html > http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html > > For your convenience, the review boilerplate template is included below. > > Note that reviews should ideally be posted to the gen-art mailing list > by COB on Tuesday: > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/ > > Mary. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: > Reviewer: > Review Date: > IETF LC End Date: > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
