I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-turner-sha0-sha1-seccon-02.txt Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review Date: 19 December 2010 IETF LC End Date: 3 January 2011 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Editorial/Nits: s2, para 2: > That is, NIST no longer considers it > appropriate to use SHA-0 for any transitions associated with the use > of cryptography Is 'transitions' the intended word here? 'Operations' or 'transactions' seems to be better a choice. s3.1: s/absent from published conference paper/absent from the published conference paper/ Reference [MD2-his] (a draft in progress) is in the references but not referred to. I don't see any places where it is needed. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
