Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-base-solution-07.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2011-01-15
IETF LC End Date: ?? (no Gen-ART LC review)
IESG Telechat date: 2011-01-20
Summary: Ready, but is it ready for BCP?
--------
I have very little time for a full review this week, but the document seems
technically competent and complete. However, I don't find enough information
in the tracker writeup to know whether it is really ready for BCP rather than
(say) Experimental status. It's complicated and operational in nature - is there
really enough operational experience for a BCP?
For example in an Appendix we find
A brief experimental trial undertaken in February 2010 revealed the
following divergent status of selected IGMP/MLD proxy
implementations...
That isn't reassuring.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
