I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Jan-28-2011
IETF LC End Date: Feb-14-2011
IESG Telechat date: Feb-17-2011
Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard.
Major issues: 0
Minor issues: 0
Nits/editorial comments: 2
1) S1, should the top-level pseudo-domain "invalid" be ".invalid"
instead?
2) This draft states that rfc2606 does not state how
implementations should treat TLDs and second-level domain
names defined in rfc2606. This draft further goes on to establish
procedures on what it means to say that a DNS name is
reserved for special use. I am curious in that is there any
draft that goes back and explains the special domain names in
rfc2606?
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
