Thanks! This looks much clearer in the way it uses normative language. IMHO it's ready for the IESG.
Regards Brian On 2011-02-21 21:17, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote: > Revision 09 addresses your comments. > There was indeed quite some work to do on the 2119 language > which we did. Hope the new rev is OK with you. > > Here is the diff between the rev you reviewed and the latest one: > > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-07&url2=draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-09 > > > Bert > document shepherd > > On 1/31/11 1:59 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Please see attached review. > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
