Thanks for the review! The only non-nit issue: > Section 7: > An earlier section mentions the capabilities to have role based access to the > tool for types of access. Since this document will later be used for an RFP > to create a tool, do you want to list out the security requirements that > would have to be met in that proposal? This may or may not be desired as > this section usually refers to the security of a protocol, etc.
I don't think this is desired because those will be defined somewhere else, probably not in the statement of work. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
