I hate to intrude, but... On 04/10/11 09:35, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Also, given the current proposal in the IDR WG to deprecate the use >> > of AS Sets (and by implication deprecate the (rarely used if ever) >> > practice of proxy aggregation, I am unsure of the need to call out >> > proxy aggregation in this context. > > I won't get into that debate ;-) >
Brian, Is this not 'proxy aggregation' but something like just announcing an aggregate where you don't actually hold the supernet as an allocated prefix to you? For example: 206.44.0.0/16 being held up for a customer by their ISP... ideally the ISP has a ROA for this, but today it's a handshake agreement with a former employee (on both sides I would bet) -chris _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
