Francis,
       Thanks for the detailed review. We are currently
working on the DISCUSSes of the IESG. We will post a
revised draft shortly.

       Glenn

(2011/06/19 8:07), Francis Dupont wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib-05.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20110527
> IETF LC End Date: 20110512
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
>   - Toc page 2 and 9 page 67: Acknowledgements ->  Acknowledgments
> 
>   - 5 page 7: incoherent zip/country order for Japan
> 
>   - 5 page 9: pmip6Stats:pmip6BindingRegcounters ->
>                                         ^
>               pmip6Stats:pmip6BindingRegcounters
>    (fortunately it is in a comment, but an ASN.1 comment :-)
> 
>   - 5 page 16: reindent pmip6MagProxyCOATable description
>   (same pages 39 and 40 for pmip6LmaMinDelayBeforeBCEDelete)
> 
>   - 5 page 22 (pmip6MagBLlMnIdentifier): bad wording (the two is for
>    the length, not the value).
>    same page 28 for pmip6BindingMnLlIdentifier
> 
>   - 5 page 24: reformat pmip6MagBLAccessTechnologyType description
> 
>   - 5 page 24 (pmip6MagBLTimeRecentlyAccepted):
>    acknowledgement ->  acknowledgment
>    (same page 29 for pmip6BindingMagLinkLocalAddress,
>     page 30 for pmip6MissingMnIdentifierOption,
>     page 31 for pmip6NotLMAForThisMobileNode, etc)
> 
>   - 5 page 31 (pmip6MissingMnIdentifierOption): router. ->  router,
> 
>   - 5 page 37 (pmip6CounterDiscontinuityTime): viz. ???
> 
>   - 5 page 41 (pmip6LmaTimestampValidityWindow): bad wording:
>    length of time ???
> 
>   - 5 page 50 (pmip6CoreReadOnlyCompliance): missing final '.' in
>    description
> 
>   - 6 page 63: extra space in 'pmip6MobileNodeGeneratedTimestampInUse :'
> 
>   - 6 page 63: IPSec ->  IPsec
> 
>   - 10 page 67: presentation should be uniformized.
> 
> Regards
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> PS: I don't remember if I sent this review, so anyway I resend it.

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to