At 03:36 AM 8/16/2011, Roni Even wrote:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC.
Thanks for your review, Roni. After 8 years, four of them following the first trip to IESG, all DISCUSSes are *finally cleared*. We'll be going ahead with the current text + an RFC Editor's note. The reference issue is well-known in a WG that makes normative references to its earlier work (obviously) and has traditionally produced all its RFCs in the Informational category - it's the relatively new classification of normative/informative that causes this issue, because the BMWG pre-dates the requirement to separate references in these categories. regards, Al bmwg chair _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
