I would argue that if the IETF has allocated an IETF meeting room during an IETF meeting week for a Bar BOF, then the Note Well should apply to that Bar BOF courtesy of the IETF's involvement (i.e., the multiple occurrences of "IETF" in this sentence).
Such a policy might also serve as a useful source of backpressure to the increasing number of Bar BOFs that are asking for IETF meeting rooms. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 [email protected] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Peter Saint-Andre > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 12:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > 'Jorge Contreras'; 'Scott O. > Bradner'; 'IESG'; 'Lars Eggert' > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Note Well applicability to bar BOFs > > On 9/9/11 10:34 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > > When I talk to my friend in the corridor of an IETF gathering I am not > > covered > > by the IPR rules. When I go to the bar and find I am redesigning IPv6 > > (again) I > > am not covered by the IPR rules. > > Actually, when you as an AD talk to your friend, doesn't Note Well > apply? Unless by "The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG" > we understand that you're not always speaking "on behalf of the IESG" > (which would be a reasonable interpretation, IMHO). > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
