I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-05
Reviewer: Martin Thomson
Review Date: 2011-10-11
IETF LC End Date: 2011-10-19

Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an Informational RFC, 
but has nits that should be considered before publication.

Nits:

This document describes a process that seems to touch on points in 2026 and 
other BCPs.  It does not clearly identify whether this process is _different_, 
or whether the intent is to simply explain the application of the BCPs with 
codec-specific elaboration.  It would appear that it's the latter, but I'm far 
from expert in these matters.  A short statement identifying the which choice, 
and the intent of any differences (if any) would be helpful.

Nitty nits:
Missing citation for ITU-R BS.1534 (MUSHRA)
Missing expansion on first use of several acronyms (e.g., PESQ, PEAQ, and 
SegSNR)

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to