On 10/18/2011 04:56 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
These are both in text quoted from RFC5420, so the comment applies
to that RFC. Clearly we can't change it in this document.
Lou: Sure, that is understandable.
(BTW usage of 'must' as in the English/informative usage is still
legitimate.)
Indeed, however, the lower-case 'must' appeared in a cluster
containing other upper case (and normative) language, so I
just wanted to point it out in case this was an oversight.
good catch! it should be:
s/LSP Attribute/LSP Attributes
[...]
another good catch:
s/LSP attributed/LSP Attributes
Much thanks!
No problem. Thank you for attending to my comments!
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
