Michael,

One response inline below [MB].

Thanks,
Mary.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Michael Tuexen <[email protected]>wrote:

> Mary,
>
> thank you very much for the review.
> See my comments in-line.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> On Oct 28, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >
> > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> > or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-tls-dtls-heartbeat-03.txt
> > Reviewer:  Mary Barnes
> > Review Date:  28 Oct 2011
> > IETF LC Date:  18 Oct 2011
> > IESG Telechat Date:  3 Nov 2011
> >
> > Summary:  Ready with editorial comments
> >
> > Editorial:
> >
> > 1) Section 2 (1st P, last sentence).  The following sentence needs some
> work (there's a missing noun before the SHOULD) - I suggest something like
> the following:
> > OLD:
> > If an endpoint has indicated peer_not_allowed_to_send and receives a
> > HeartbeatRequest message SHOULD drop the message silently and MAY
> > send an unexpected_message Alert message.
> >
> > NEW:
> > If an endpoint that has indicated peer_not_allowed_to_send receives a
> HeartbeatRequest message, the endpoint SHOULD drop the message silently and
> MAY send an unexpected_message Alert message.
> I agree. I made the change in our CVS version, so the change will be
> included in the next revision.
> >
> > 2) Section 3: Should the "has to be" in this sentence be a MUST?
> >    Whenever a HeartbeatRequest message is
> >    received, it has to be answered with a corresponding
> >    HeartbeatResponse message.
> I think SHOULD is better since the next sentences describe exceptions.
> I changed it to SHOULD in CVS. If this change is not OK for you,
> please let me know.
>
[MB] I think SHOULD is fine. [/MB]

>
> Again: Thank you very much for the comments.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to