I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other IESG review comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-05
    RPL Option for Carrying RPL Information in Data-Plane Datagrams
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 22-Nov-2011
IETF LC End Date: 31-Oct-2011
IESG Telechat date: 1-Dec-2011

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.

Major issues:
    The major issue from earlier my review has been resolved.

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
While calling a bit the O bit does not appear unreasonable, I note that when looking at the packet form, the difference between the O bit and the mbz bits marked as 0 is small, and a likely source of confusion for the reader.


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to