I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design-03
Reviewer:  Richard Barnes
Review Date: 2011-11-23
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: 2011-12-01

Summary:  Largely complete, but hard to use

Major issues: 

The document seems to make several architectural assumptions that are not 
clearly stated.  For example, both this document and the HOKEY problem 
statement [RFC5169] make reference to "home" and "visited" networks, terms 
which are defined in neither document.  It would be helpful if this document 
could clarify some of these issues that are left vague by the problem statement.

Likewise, the document states the architecture in terms of several "functions" 
that are performed by "components".  For a reader unfamiliar with the history 
of this document, it is not clear how these functions work together to solve 
the problems laid out in RFC 5169.  

The components are also given suggestive names, but not defined.  For example, 
there are components named "serving authenticator" and "candidate 
authenticator", whose names seem to imply that they play particular roles in 
the protocol or occupy particular places in the network.  But the document 
never explains this beyond the names.

Minor issues:


Editorial nits:

Version -10 appears to have introduced the term "DSrRK", which appears nowhere 
else in the document.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to