On 11/29/2011 10:18 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Stig,


On 11/28/2011 12:59 PM, Stig Venaas wrote:
Please note that the Connection ID AFI in the PORT Hello Option does not
need to match the address family of PIM Hello message that carries it.
e.g. an IPv6 PIM Hello message could contain a PORT Hello Option with a
TCP Connection ID AFI of 1 (IPv4).

While I am OK with this text, wouldn't it be better to add this to 3.1
and 3.2 where we formally define the hello options?

My proposal would be:

End of 3.1:

OLD:
     TCP Connection ID AFI:   The AFI value to describe the address-family
        of the address of the TCP Connection ID field.  When this field is
        0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to
        obtain the addresses used to establish the TCP connection.

NEW:
     TCP Connection ID AFI:   The AFI value to describe the address-family
        of the address of the TCP Connection ID field. Note that this
        value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM Hello
        message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism
        outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the
        addresses used to establish the TCP connection.

End of 3.2:

OLD:
     SCTP Connection ID AFI:   The AFI value to describe the address-
        family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field.  When this
        field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used
        to obtain the addresses used to establish the SCTP connection.

NEW:
     SCTP Connection ID AFI:   The AFI value to describe the address-
        family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field. Note that
        this value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM
        Hello message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism
        outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the
        addresses used to establish the SCTP connection.

What do you think?

This works great.

Great, I hope we can then just add a note for the editor, and that the
discuss can be cleared...

Stig


Thanks
Suresh

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to