On 1/23/12 4:52 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > Hi Peter, > > -02 is a marked improvement over the version I reviewed. All my > concerns were addressed. > > --Martin > > On Jan 18, 2012 8:14 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Martin, here is my perspective... >> >> On 12/17/11 ?:46 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> > "It is easy" is not an especially good reason. >> >> Martin, is there *harm* in completing these registrations via >> informational RFCs? > > I don't find that reason any more compelling. How about: "this is the > one we chose and there isn't a good reason to choose either, so this > will do"? Which is probably what you meant anyhow...
How about: "everyone else was doing it that way so the author didn't see a good reason to buck the trend"? _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
