Hi Suresh, thanks for your review. The authors will take care of these comments in the next revision of the draft.
Cheers, Gonzalo On 20/02/2012 5:02 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for > draft-ietf-simple-chat-13.txt > > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but > I have a few comments. > > Section 3: > > REQ-3: It is unclear why this is separate from REQ-2. In my reading, > REQ-2 already covers REQ-3. > > Section 6.1 > > This sentence is not clear. Can you clarify/reword. > > "Having the header of the Message/CPIM wrapper only in the first chunk, > the MSRP switch MUST track the Message-Id until the last chunk of the > message has been distributed." > > Thanks > Suresh > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
