I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-05.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20120224 IETF LC End Date: 20120306 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - 1 page 3: P2P and CDN are not in the list of well known abbrevs (IMHO for the first one because P2P means Point-to-Point too) so should be introduced at the first use in the body (and for CDN IMHO as soon as possible, this is why I put this in 1) - 1 page 3: in the networks. -> in networks. ? - 3.1 page 4: IMHO [Internet Study 2008/2009] should be removed to leave only the reference, i.e., [Internet_Study_2008-2009] - 4.1 page 7: 'nor can they manage access' is a wording which could (so should) be improved a bit, IMHO 'nor access' is enough - A pages 11 and 12: e.g. -> e.g., (also at end of line but it is in an appendix 'to be removed by the RFC Editor'...) Regards [email protected] PS: my dictionary dislikes 'infrastructural'? _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
