In your previous mail you wrote: > I would like to point out that feedback implosion actually can be > seen as an implosion event. All the feedback traffic generated are > concentrated at the target for the feedback. Thus causing an > implosion of the feedback target under the "weight" of all the > feedback. > > But, seriously "Feedback Implosion" is an established expression > within computer science. Thus although it may not be all correct we > shouldn't change it. I would recommend that you google "Feedback > Implosion" all the hits on the first page are related to computer > science, at least for me.
=> hum, it seems the incorrect use of the term implosion is well established. IMHO it should be like the use of the incorrect term encrypted, so should be handled the same way: to fix it is the right way in French, in English it is pedantic so in general should not be fixed (and this is a real example for RFCs). So I give up on it... Thanks [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
