On May 14, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Thanks Ben. > > All entered as RFC Editor notes except the last one... > > >> -- 2.2, paragraph 5: "... definition of the Association ID, which is (quoting >> [RFC4872]):" >> >> The quoted text this refers to is more of a description of use than a > definition. > > I agree, but don't think any change is needed. The full text here is... > > They > also share the same definition of the Association ID, which is > (quoting [RFC4872]): > > "The Association ID MUST be set to the LSP ID of the LSP being > protected by this LSP or the LSP protecting this LSP. If unknown, > this value is set to its own signaled LSP ID value (default). > Also, the value of the Association ID MAY change during the > lifetime of the LSP." > > Thus "which is" means "and here is a description". > > If you feel really strongly we can probably work something out.
No problem at all. It was pedantic enough that I almost didn't include it :-) _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
