Feature request for the tool: a place to put reviews so that I don't keep forgetting to CC the gen-art list.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Thomson <[email protected]> Date: 20 May 2012 19:34 Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04 To: [email protected] I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04 Reviewer: Martin Thomson Review Date: 2012-05-20 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft clarifies a point of potential confusion around the use of the TCP MSS. The draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC, with a couple of nits. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: Opinion... The draft seems a little long. Section 4 contains the only truly crucial point: namely the one made after the matrix. That alone, plus the short description in Section 2, seems sufficient. The appendix is excessive. Section 6 does not contain security considerations. It need not contain anything. Sections 3 and 5 have extra indentation for their subsections. The table in Section 4 has a wayward period. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
