Forgot to copy gen-art.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Richard L. Barnes" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18
> Date: May 25, 2012 5:02:28 PM EDT
> To: IESG <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18
> Reviewer: Richard Barnes
> Review Date: May-25-2012
> IETF LC End Date: Not known
> IESG Telechat date: Jan-05-2012
> 
> Summary: Almost ready, couple of questions
> 
> MAJOR:
> 
> 4.1.
> It's not clear what the threat model is that this section is designed to 
> address.  If the zone operator is malicious, then it can simulate the 
> necessary zone cut and still prove the non-existence of records in the child 
> zone.  
> 
> 5.10.
> I find the recommendation of the "Accept Any Success" policy troubling.  It 
> deals very poorly with compromise (and other roll-over scenarios): Suppose 
> there are two trust anchors, one for example.com and one for 
> child.example.com.  If the private key corresponding to the TA for 
> child.example.com is compromised, but the validator continues to trust it, 
> this negates the benefit provided by the parent (example.com) facilitating a 
> rollover.  Suggest an alternative policy, "Highest Signer": Out of the set of 
> keys configured as TAs, the validator only uses a key as a TA (for purposes 
> of validation) if there does not exist a DNSSEC path from it to any other TA. 
>  This policy seems like more work to enforce (because you have to do more 
> backward chaining), but ISTM that the validator should have the necessary 
> DNSSEC records anyway, so it's just a matter a couple of quick checks.
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to