On 8 June 2012 00:33, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Please see attached review. I haven't cc'ed the IETF or IESG since > my comment is only a process issue, but this can be forwarded as you > think fit. If the IESG can see a way round it consistent with RFC 2026, > that would be fine by me.
The "Updates" in RFC 5785 is an error, as noted in an erratum on that document. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
