Brian,
On 6/7/12 8:28 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
S Moonesamy wrote:
Brian Carpenter wrote:
Also, RFC4406 states that "Sending domains MAY publish either or both
formats" (i.e. spf1 or spf2.0). That being so, I would ideally expect
to see nine rows in the results table:
SPF RR only, spf1 only
SPF RR only, spf2.0 only
SPF RR only, spf1 and spf2.0
TXT RR only, spf1 only
TXT RR only, spf2.0 only
TXT RR only, spf1 and spf2.0
SPF and TXT RRs, spf1 only
SPF and TXT RRs, spf2.0 only
SPF and TXT RRs, spf1 and spf2.0
Pete suggests having two tables for each survey: (a) a comparison of
RRTYPEs, and (b) a comparison of SPF vs. SIDF independent of RRTYPE.
Would that be sufficient?
I am looking for clear presentation of the observed data, nothing more,
as I do whenever I read a data-based document. As my review stated,
I have no problem with the conclusions drawn in the draft.
I'm afraid you got distracted by Hector's question and didn't answer
SM's. Please do.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
