Wassim, Thanks for the review, please see below:
On 19/06/2012 19:44, "Wassim Haddad" <[email protected]> wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. > >Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may >receive. > >Document: draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-06 >Reviewer: Wassim Haddad >Review Date: 2012-06-19 >IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-06 >IESG Telechat date: 2012-06-21 > >Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational standard >but one (helpful) addition is suggested. > >Major issues: None > >Minor issues: > >- Sectiom 1.1: suggest defining "Quality of Experience" (mentioned 4 >times in the document) In my working copy, I have added the following to the terminology section: Quality of Experience (QoE): As defined in Section 2.4 of [RFC6390] (Thanks Benoit for the pointer) Ben _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
