Hi Suresh,

Thanks for the time you've spent looking through the document.

Comments inline:

> Minor
> =====
> 
> * This document references obsolete versions of IMAP and SMTP. Is there
> any specific reason for referring to the older versions? If not, I
> recommend replacing references to
> 
> -> RFC2060 with RFC3501
> -> RFC2821 with RFC5321

Fixed.


> 
> * Section 3.7
> 
> The following text is a bit out of date.
> 
> "At present, authentication to these applications will be typically
>   configured manually by the user on the device (or on a different
>   device connected to that device) but inputting their (usually pre-
>   provisioned out-of-band) credentials for that application - one per
>   application."
> 
> With systems such as IMS that have gotten deployed, at least telco
> operator hosted applications can use some form of federated identity
> already. I do not have strong feelings about this but I suggest leaving
> out operator hosted applications from this characterisation.

This use case came directly from some authors involved in operating mobile 
platforms. I think it's still useful to leave it in there as there are a 
variety of non-operator hosted applications that may not have such a thing 
enabled. The text currently says "could be hosted by the telecoms operator, or 
could be any application or system on the internet" which I think means the 
point is still valid...



> * Section 3.9
> 
> I am not sure I understand the following text
> 
> "The utility company may wish to
>   grant access only to authorized devices; for example, a consortium of
>   utility companies and device manufacturers may certify devices to
>   connect to power networks."
> 
> What does the word certify mean here? I have always understood it to
> mean testing compliance to certain requirements rather than verification
> of identity. Can you please clarify?

In this case it would be exactly as you say - testing compliance to certain 
requirements. In the case of utility networks, it might mean that a particular 
device has the "usual" power certifications about how it uses electricity, but 
also certification around its "smartness" - what identity technologies it 
supports, what levels of assurance it can comply with around identity 
assertion, etc.

Hope that helps?

Thanks!
Rhys.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to