On 02/01/2013 01:22 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
Some elements are scattered though the IETF meeting archives as this
was discussed in the RTGWG meetings.
However some aspects are too sensitive to publish as we looked
at the expected behaviour on operational networks complete with
costs.
Stewart: Sure, I can understand the need for sensitivity.
Would be nice to have a canonical topology stripped of any sensitive
network configuration, but I realize that this is not a necessity nor
a prerequisite for moving the draft ahead. That is why I indicated
this as a nit.
However, the engineer in me likes to see papers with results
that can easily be duplicated by others working in the domain.
That said, please move ahead with the draft from my end. I have
no further comments.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
