Hi,
> 1. In table 1 the Transform ID are specified as TBD1 to TBD4. I noticed
> that IANA have already assigned values
> 27-30. So they should be specified. If not it will be good to ask the RFC
> editor before publication to update the table.
> I saw that you only asked IANA to allocate values.
I'll do so in the next version if it is not done by the RFC editor.
>
> 2. In the IANA section I did not understand to which table you are
> referring to “For the new entries in the table
> of the Transform Type 4 repository, a reference to Section 2.3 of
> [IKE_DH_Req] shall be included in the column named
> "Recipient Tests” indicating the required checks for the other peer's
> Diffie-Hellman public keys.”
>
This refers to the Table Transform Type 4 - Diffie-Hellman Group Transform IDs,
see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xml#ikev2-parameters-8
[IKE_DH_Req] requests from IANA to add a new column (named "Recipient Tests")
to that Table. We request IANA to add in
that new column a a reference to Section 2.3 of [IKE_DH_Req].
This request has been correctly understood by IANA, see email below.
Best regards,
Johannes
--- Begin Message ---
(BEGIN IANA LAST CALL COMMENTS)
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:
IANA has reviewed draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool-03. Authors should review
the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and
respond to any questions as soon as possible.
We understand that there is a single action required to be completed
upon approval of this document.
We understand that the following four new Transform IDs have been
added to the "Transform Type 4 - Diffie-Hellman Group Transform IDs"
subregistry upon the completion of ticket 666056:
URL: www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters
Note (from the designed expert done earlier):
Note, that this draft also requires that the actions from the
draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks is also done. The
draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks adds the Recipient Tests column to
"Transform Type 4 - Diffie-Hellman Group Transform IDs" registry, and
this draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool also fills that column.
IANA understands that these are the only actions requested by this
document.
Thanks,
Pearl Liang
ICANN/IANA
(END IANA LAST CALL COMMENTS)
On Tue Feb 26 16:06:45 2013, [email protected] wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Using the ECC Brainpool Curves for IKEv2 Key Exchange'
> <draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool-03.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [email protected] mailing lists by 2013-03-26. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> This document specifies the use of ECC Brainpool elliptic curve
> groups for key exchange in the Internet Key Exchange version 2
> (IKEv2) protocol.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
