Thanks for your review, Christer. The document is up for discussion in this week's IESG telechat (on Thursday).
Peter: Have you seen Christer's question about Section 2.6? Jari On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> > > Document: draft-saintandre-urn-example-04 > > Reviewer: Christer Holmberg > > Review Date: 25 March 2013 > > IETF LC End Date: 9 April 2013 > > IETF Telechat Date 11 April 2013 > > Summary: The draft is well written, with a very minor editorial comment, and > is ready for publication. > > Major Issues: None > > Minor Issues: None > > Editorial nits: Section 2.6 contains the word “counseled”. While not wrong, > is there a reason why more common IETF language can’t be used here? E.g. > “recommended against”, or something? :) > > Best regards, > > Christer > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
