Hi, Could you say something like "including references to test case descriptions and interoperability reports, when such exist."?
Regards, Christer -----Original Message----- From: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 24. huhtikuuta 2013 15:44 To: Christer Holmberg Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Genart review of draft-sheffer-running-code-04 Hi Christer, thanks for your review! The current (rather vague) wording is: In addition, this section can contain information about the interoperability of any or all of the implementations. We could add: "including references to interoperability reports, when such exist." Thanks, Yaron On 2013-04-24 10:40, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> > > Document: draft-sheffer-running-code-04 > > Reviewer: Christer Holmberg > > Review Date: 23 April 2013 > > IETF LC End Date: 10 May 2013 > > IETF Telechat Date N/A > > Summary: The draft is well written, with a minor issues/question. > > Major Issues: None > > Minor Issues: I think it would be good to also describe and/or > reference the test cases that were performed in order to determine the > interoperability. In some cases it may be obvious, but if an > Internet-Draft specifies a large protocol, with many features and > options, just saying that there exist interoperability between two > implementations doesn’t really say much. > > Editorial nits: None > > Best regards, > > Christer > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
