I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/06/10 IESG Telechat date: 2013/06/13 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but I had a few minor comments as identified in my last call review dated 2013/05/08. The authors had agreed to fix the following issues but I have not seen an updated draft yet. Minor ===== * Section 5.2 - The Interface-Id option is the DHCPv6 equivalent of the circuit identifier defined in RFC3046. Please add a reference to Section 22.18 of RFC3315 that describes this option. - Is there any specific reason that the giaddr is being specified using the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address format? From my reading giaddr is of type bt:ipAddressType and it allows specification of both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses natively. * Section 8.7 Page 53 I think there may be an off-by-one error here. <xs:maxInclusive value="268435456"/> Shouldn't this be <xs:maxInclusive value="268435455"/> so that the largest value will fit in 28 bits? Thanks Suresh _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
