Thank you for this review, Alexey. I have balloted a No-Objection based on it.
BTW, the thread title is wrong, but I assume the review is on the GMPLS document draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req as your comments match the document content :-) Jari On Jun 6, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07 > Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov > Review Date: 2013-06-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2013-06-07 > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC. > > Major issues: None. > > Minor issues: None. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > I might have missed that, but I think the first mention of ERO > needs expansion of the acronym and a reference. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
