On Aug 12, 2013, at 23:41, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Having more than one way to encode +/- Infinity seems like a recipe for > generating slightly different canonical output. For example, in my code > right now, I think I'm always generating a half-precision Infinity, and > I'm thinking about changing that to always be the 4-byte version. Ah, got it. Infinity/-Infinity are supposed to be covered by the float shortening rule (which just doesn't work with NaNs). We'll make that explicit. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
