Suresh: Thank you very much for your review. Carsten et al, I think Suresh 
raises some valid points here. I'll note the focus on other things besides 
sensors in particular.

Jari

On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-05.txt
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review Date: 2013/08/12
> IESG Telechat date: 2013/08/15
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but
> I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider.
> 
> Minor
> =====
> 
> * Section 1
> 
> Aren't actuators also one class of constrained devices? The section
> talks about gathering information but does not talk about constrained
> devices acting on information.
> 
> * Section 2.1
> 
> When speaking about the multiple facets of constraints on the nodes
> shouldn't processing power be included as well? There is an item for
> power but it is unclear if that means energy/power or processing power.
> In either case one of them probably needs to be added.
> 
> * Section 2.2
> 
> Would it be worth mentioning the asymmetric nature of some of these link
> as a constraint?
> 
> * Section 2.3.1
> 
> This sentence does not read right. Suggest rewording.
> 
> OLD:
> In its terminology document, the ROLL working group is saying
> [I-D.ietf-roll-terminology]:
> 
> NEW:
> The ROLL terminology document [I-D.ietf-roll-terminology] defines LLNs
> as follows:
> 
> 
> * Section 3
> 
> Please add a reference to the CoAP draft at first use of CoAP.
> 
> 
> * Section 4.3
> 
> Should this section also talk a bit about the term "duty cycle" since
> this term is used frequently in the constrained device context?
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to