Hi Brian, thank's for the response. A couple of comments below; I've removed sections that do not appear to need further comment.
On Oct 6, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > >> -- section 3, first bullet list item: >> >> Is it worth mentioning SRV here? > > I don't think so, because you can play load balancing tricks with AAAA > or CNAME too. > I'm okay with not specifically mentioning it--but SRV weight field and selection algorithm does seem a bit more closely tailored to load balancing than playing tricks with other record types. [...] >> -- section 5, 2nd paragraph: "Specifically, the specification [ ] states..." >> >> Is that an intentional Tom Swiftie? :-) > > Actually we can change the actual text. > :-) _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
