Thanks for your review, Suresh. I have balloted a no-objection, but would also like to hear from the authors if they have seen Suresh's comments below. Have you?
Jari On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer > for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before > posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-worley-service-example-13.txt > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > Review Date: 2013/10/08 > IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/10 > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but > I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. > > Minor > ===== > > * Please add an IANA considerations section to the draft stating that > the draft requires no IANA actions. > > Enhancement request > =================== > > * Maybe it is too much to ask, but it would be great if the mailing list > references contained an URL to the archive as it is easier to get the > right mail. I leave it upto your discretion if you want to do this or not. > > e.g. > > For > [kyzivat-2] > Kyzivat, P., "[Sip-implementors] draft-worley-service- > example-02", sip-implementors mailing list 020426, > September 2008. > > > add > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2008-September/020426.html > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
