Thank you so much for the review, Francis! I plan to post a no-objection ballot position but first I'd like to ensure that the authors have seen these comments. Have you?
Jari On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20131014 > IETF LC End Date: 20131027 > IESG Telechat date: 20131024 > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: (BTW only editorial comments) > - Title page 1: Ruting -> Routing > > - Abstract page 1: e.g. -> e.g., > > - ToC page 2 and 5 page 7: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 2 page 3: commisioning -> commissioning > > - 2 page 4 Data Sink: move the LBR into from Field Device to here > > - 2 page 4 and many pages 5 and 6: e.g. -> e.g., and i.e. -> i.e., > > - 2 page 4: I suggest to use real units, i.e., KiB (aka kibibyte) > and kbits/s (K not followed by i stands for Kelvin :-) > > - 2 page 5 P2MP: RFC4461]and [RFC4875] -> RFC4461] and [RFC4875] > > - 2 page 6: arbitratry -> arbitrary > > Regards > > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
