I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq<https://rvi.se.ericsson.net/owa/,DanaInfo=mail.internal.ericsson.com,SSL+redir.aspx?C=k4BkgTOb0kqMwInfhSKV2eOmm5R5pNAIcxfkuxxc_yPfitL2HfjHkY6t_bzLU3m0uzDpjrO0Omc.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwiki.tools.ietf.org%2farea%2fgen%2ftrac%2fwiki%2fGenArtfaq>>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a
new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-12
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review Date: 24 October
IETF LC End Date: 19 September, 2013
IESG Telechat date: 24 October
Summary: The document is well written, and ready for publication, but
I think one of the editorial nit I previously raised is still not addressed.
Major issues: -
Minor issues: -
Nits/editorial comments:
General:
-----------
Q_G_1: The document still uses inconsistent terminology when
referencing ITU-T specifications. Examples:
- G.709 [G.709-2012]
- [G.709-2012]
- ITU-T G.872 recommendation [G.872]
- G.709-2012
- ITU-T G.798 [G.798]
etc etc...
When I sent my previous review, you suggestion was to use "ITU-T
recommendation G.XXX used on first use and then just G.XXX".
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
