On 2013-11-18 22:39, Moriarty, Kathleen wrote:
Hi Julian,
Sorry, I should have looked at the comparison, the 'IP address' error is
picking up on a section number that went to the next line and does not have
Section in front of it. This is fine.
As for the pre-2008 message, I can't see why that is getting picked up by
idnits, but it is just a warning.
The for the third one, in RFC2616, the header says that it 'obsoletes' RFC2068
as opposed to saying it 'updates' RFC2068. I am not sure how this one should
get handled as RFC2068 is listed as obsolete and referencing it may be an
issue. Was there a decision to deprecate this functionality when the RFC was
revised?
Maybe either Jari or Barry have an opinion on how to handle the last one.
Whatever happened here happened 14 years ago.
This spec just populates the IANA registry, and RFC 2068 is the latest
spec that defines LINK and UNLINK.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
