-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Wassim,

Thanks for the review.  Please see my answers below.

On 11/20/2013 03:50 PM, Wassim Haddad wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10 Reviewer:  Wassim
> Haddad Review Date: 20 Nov 2013 IETF LC End Date: 22 Oct 2013 IETF Telechat
> Date: 21 Nov 2013
> 
> Summary:  This draft is almost ready for publication as proposed standard
> 
> - Major Issues: None
> 
> - Minor Issues:
> 
> -> In the introduction section, I suggest re-wording the following (long
> and not so clear) sentence:
> 
> "Schulzrinne, et al. [RFC3550] lists using multiple clock rates as one of
> the reasons to not use different payloads on the same SSRC but
> unfortunately this advice has not always been followed and some RTP
> implementations change the payload in the same SSRC even if the different
> payloads use different clock rates".

Do you have a suggestion to make this sentence better?

> 
> -> Please consider adding the following to the terminology section: -
> SSRC, - Lip, - SR

SSRC and SR (and RR) are already scheduled for expansion in the next version
but I do not think they require an entry in the terminology section, as they
are already defined in RFC 3550.  On the other hand I an not sure why you want
a definition for "Lip" as it is used in the text in its dictionary sense (RFC
3550 does not define lip either).

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: [email protected]
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=YypU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to