Thank you Kathleen for your review (and the whole, extensive reviewing work that you've done for this week's telechat in Gen-ART)!
I have placed a no-obj position for this document on tonight's IESG telechat. Jari On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:30 PM, "Moriarty, Kathleen" <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking-09 > Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty > Review Date: December 18, 2013 > IETF LC End Date: ? > IESG Telechat date: December 19, 2013 > > Summary: The document is ready with nits. It is well written and did a nice > job of providing refernces throughout the document where needed. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: In the second to last paragraph of section 6, the > word “loose” should be “lose”: > However, the downstream hosts may loose the data packets > until the routing path is reestablished and the data forwarding is > restarted. > > In the security consideration section, no comma is necessary in the following > sentence as there are only two items in the list: > > In order to mitigate such threats, a router enabling the explicit > tracking function may limit a total amount of membership information > the router can store, or may rate-limit State-Change Report messages > per host. > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
